1997 Bentley Turbo vs. 1963 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1997 Bentley Turbo is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1997 Bentley Turbo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Bentley Turbo weights approximately 255 kg more than 1963 Cadillac 62.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Bentley Turbo | 1963 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | Bentley | Cadillac |
Model | Turbo | 62 |
Year Released | 1997 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6750 cc | 6390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 396 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2395 kg | 2140 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5400 mm | 5670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 3300 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 94 L | 79 L |