1997 Bentley Turbo vs. 2005 Mazda 6
To start off, 2005 Mazda 6 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Bentley Turbo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Bentley Turbo would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1997 Bentley Turbo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Bentley Turbo (396 HP @ 4150 RPM) has 176 more horse power than 2005 Mazda 6. (220 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Bentley Turbo should accelerate faster than 2005 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Bentley Turbo weights approximately 877 kg more than 2005 Mazda 6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1997 Bentley Turbo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 Bentley Turbo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Bentley Turbo (800 Nm) has 540 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mazda 6. (260 Nm). This means 1997 Bentley Turbo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Bentley Turbo | 2005 Mazda 6 | |
| Make | Bentley | Mazda |
| Model | Turbo | 6 |
| Year Released | 1997 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6750 cc | 2966 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 396 HP | 220 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4150 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 800 Nm | 260 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 104.1 mm | 89 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 99.1 mm | 80 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.7:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2395 kg | 1518 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5400 mm | 4750 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2120 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 17.8 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 94 L | 68 L |
