1997 BMW 850 vs. 1969 Citroen Dyane 4
To start off, 1997 BMW 850 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Citroen Dyane 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Citroen Dyane 4 would be higher. At 5,379 cc (12 cylinders), 1997 BMW 850 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 BMW 850 (329 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 305 more horse power than 1969 Citroen Dyane 4. (24 HP @ 6750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1997 BMW 850 should accelerate faster than 1969 Citroen Dyane 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 BMW 850 weights approximately 1351 kg more than 1969 Citroen Dyane 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1997 BMW 850 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 BMW 850. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1969 Citroen Dyane 4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 BMW 850 (490 Nm) has 461 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Citroen Dyane 4. (29 Nm). This means 1997 BMW 850 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Citroen Dyane 4.
Compare all specifications:
1997 BMW 850 | 1969 Citroen Dyane 4 | |
Make | BMW | Citroen |
Model | 850 | Dyane 4 |
Year Released | 1997 | 1969 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5379 cc | 425 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 329 HP | 24 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6750 RPM |
Torque | 490 Nm | 29 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 85.1 mm | 68.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79 mm | 59 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 8.8:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1945 kg | 594 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 3880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1510 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2410 mm |