1997 BMW 850 vs. 2002 Cadillac CTS

To start off, 2002 Cadillac CTS is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 BMW 850. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 BMW 850 would be higher. At 5,379 cc (12 cylinders), 1997 BMW 850 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 BMW 850 (329 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 119 more horse power than 2002 Cadillac CTS. (210 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1997 BMW 850 should accelerate faster than 2002 Cadillac CTS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 BMW 850 weights approximately 385 kg more than 2002 Cadillac CTS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 BMW 850 (490 Nm) has 194 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Cadillac CTS. (296 Nm). This means 1997 BMW 850 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Cadillac CTS. 1997 BMW 850 has automatic transmission and 2002 Cadillac CTS has manual transmission. 2002 Cadillac CTS will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1997 BMW 850 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1997 BMW 850 2002 Cadillac CTS
Make BMW Cadillac
Model 850 CTS
Year Released 1997 2002
Body Type Coupe Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5379 cc 3179 cc
Engine Cylinders 12 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Horse Power 329 HP 210 HP
Engine RPM 4800 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 490 Nm 296 Nm
Engine Bore Size 85.1 mm 87.5 mm
Engine Stroke Size 79 mm 88 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.0:1 10.0:1
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1945 kg 1560 kg
Vehicle Length 4790 mm 4840 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1800 mm
Vehicle Height 1350 mm 1450 mm
Wheelbase Size 2690 mm 2940 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]