1997 BMW M3 vs. 1959 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1997 BMW M3 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 BMW M3 (240 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 1959 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1997 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1959 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 825 kg more than 1997 BMW M3.
1959 Cadillac 62 has automatic transmission and 1997 BMW M3 has manual transmission. 1997 BMW M3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1959 Cadillac 62 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 BMW M3 | 1959 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | M3 | 62 |
| Year Released | 1997 | 1959 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3201 cc | 6382 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 240 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 2125 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 5730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 2040 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 3310 mm |
