1997 BMW M3 vs. 1966 Volvo 144

To start off, 1997 BMW M3 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Volvo 144. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Volvo 144 would be higher. At 3,201 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 BMW M3 (240 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 140 more horse power than 1966 Volvo 144. (100 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1997 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1966 Volvo 144. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 BMW M3 weights approximately 110 kg more than 1966 Volvo 144. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 BMW M3 (236 Nm) has 83 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Volvo 144. (153 Nm). This means 1997 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Volvo 144.

Compare all specifications:

1997 BMW M3 1966 Volvo 144
Make BMW Volvo
Model M3 144
Year Released 1997 1966
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3201 cc 1986 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 240 HP 100 HP
Engine RPM 4800 RPM 5600 RPM
Torque 236 Nm 153 Nm
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1300 kg 1190 kg
Vehicle Length 4440 mm 4660 mm
Vehicle Width 1720 mm 1730 mm
Vehicle Height 1370 mm 1450 mm
Wheelbase Size 2710 mm 2620 mm