1997 BMW M3 vs. 1992 Cadillac Allante

To start off, 1997 BMW M3 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Cadillac Allante. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Cadillac Allante would be higher. At 4,565 cc (8 cylinders), 1992 Cadillac Allante is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Cadillac Allante (290 HP) has 50 more horse power than 1997 BMW M3. (240 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Cadillac Allante should accelerate faster than 1997 BMW M3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Cadillac Allante weights approximately 408 kg more than 1997 BMW M3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1997 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Cadillac Allante, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1992 Cadillac Allante has automatic transmission and 1997 BMW M3 has manual transmission. 1997 BMW M3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1992 Cadillac Allante will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: