1997 BMW M3 vs. 1999 Renault Clio
To start off, 1999 Renault Clio is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 BMW M3 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 BMW M3 weights approximately 365 kg more than 1999 Renault Clio.
Because 1997 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 BMW M3 | 1999 Renault Clio | |
| Make | BMW | Renault |
| Model | M3 | Clio |
| Year Released | 1997 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 240 HP | 0 HP |
| Top Speed | 220 km/hour | 181 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 935 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2770 mm |
