1997 BMW M3 vs. 2001 Cadillac LMP
To start off, 2001 Cadillac LMP is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 BMW M3 would be higher. At 4,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Cadillac LMP is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Cadillac LMP (300 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 1997 BMW M3. (240 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Cadillac LMP should accelerate faster than 1997 BMW M3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Cadillac LMP (401 Nm) has 165 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 BMW M3. (236 Nm). This means 2001 Cadillac LMP will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 BMW M3. 2001 Cadillac LMP has automatic transmission and 1997 BMW M3 has manual transmission. 1997 BMW M3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Cadillac LMP will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 BMW M3 | 2001 Cadillac LMP | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | M3 | LMP |
| Year Released | 1997 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 3201 cc | 4000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 240 HP | 300 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 236 Nm | 401 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 1 seats |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 3090 mm |
