1997 BMW M3 vs. 2002 Ford Econoline
To start off, 2002 Ford Econoline is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 BMW M3 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 BMW M3 (240 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 2002 Ford Econoline. (198 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1997 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Econoline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Econoline weights approximately 1025 kg more than 1997 BMW M3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford Econoline (338 Nm) has 102 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 BMW M3. (236 Nm). This means 2002 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 BMW M3.
Compare all specifications:
1997 BMW M3 | 2002 Ford Econoline | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | M3 | Econoline |
Year Released | 1997 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3201 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 240 HP | 198 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Torque | 236 Nm | 338 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 2325 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 3510 mm |