1997 BMW M3 vs. 2004 Kia Optima

To start off, 2004 Kia Optima is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 BMW M3 would be higher. At 3,201 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 BMW M3 (240 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 103 more horse power than 2004 Kia Optima. (137 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1997 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2004 Kia Optima. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Kia Optima weights approximately 188 kg more than 1997 BMW M3.

Because 1997 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Kia Optima, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 BMW M3 (236 Nm) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Kia Optima. (199 Nm). This means 1997 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Kia Optima.

Compare all specifications:

1997 BMW M3 2004 Kia Optima
Make BMW Kia
Model M3 Optima
Year Released 1997 2004
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3201 cc 2360 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 240 HP 137 HP
Engine RPM 4800 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 236 Nm 199 Nm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.2:1 10.0:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1300 kg 1488 kg
Vehicle Length 4440 mm 4730 mm
Vehicle Width 1720 mm 1820 mm
Vehicle Height 1370 mm 1420 mm
Wheelbase Size 2710 mm 2710 mm