1997 BMW M3 vs. 2011 Honda CR-V

To start off, 2011 Honda CR-V is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 BMW M3 would be higher. At 3,201 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 BMW M3 (240 HP) has 92 more horse power than 2011 Honda CR-V. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1997 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2011 Honda CR-V.

Because 1997 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Honda CR-V, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Honda CR-V (350 Nm) has 114 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 BMW M3. (236 Nm). This means 2011 Honda CR-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 BMW M3. 2011 Honda CR-V has automatic transmission and 1997 BMW M3 has manual transmission. 1997 BMW M3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Honda CR-V will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: