1997 BMW M3 vs. 2013 Cadillac ATS

To start off, 2013 Cadillac ATS is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 BMW M3 would be higher. At 3,201 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac ATS (268 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 1997 BMW M3. (240 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac ATS should accelerate faster than 1997 BMW M3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac ATS weights approximately 230 kg more than 1997 BMW M3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac ATS (353 Nm) has 117 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 BMW M3. (236 Nm). This means 2013 Cadillac ATS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 BMW M3. 2013 Cadillac ATS has automatic transmission and 1997 BMW M3 has manual transmission. 1997 BMW M3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Cadillac ATS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1997 BMW M3 2013 Cadillac ATS
Make BMW Cadillac
Model M3 ATS
Year Released 1997 2013
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3201 cc 2000 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 240 HP 268 HP
Engine RPM 4800 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 236 Nm 353 Nm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.2:1 9.5
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual 6-speed automatic
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1300 kg 1530 kg
Vehicle Length 4440 mm 4643 mm
Vehicle Width 1720 mm 1806 mm
Vehicle Height 1370 mm 1420 mm
Wheelbase Size 2710 mm 2776 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]