1997 BMW Mini ACV 30 vs. 1960 Mazda R 360

To start off, 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Mazda R 360. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Mazda R 360 would be higher. At 1,798 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30 (140 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 124 more horse power than 1960 Mazda R 360. (16 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30 should accelerate faster than 1960 Mazda R 360. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30 weights approximately 1215 kg more than 1960 Mazda R 360. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1960 Mazda R 360 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Mazda R 360. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30 (260 Nm) has 238 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Mazda R 360. (22 Nm). This means 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Mazda R 360. 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30 has automatic transmission and 1960 Mazda R 360 has manual transmission. 1960 Mazda R 360 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: