1997 BMW Mini ACV 30 vs. 1978 Mazda RX-2

To start off, 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 2,290 cc, 1978 Mazda RX-2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30 (140 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1978 Mazda RX-2. (118 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30 should accelerate faster than 1978 Mazda RX-2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30 weights approximately 635 kg more than 1978 Mazda RX-2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1978 Mazda RX-2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Mazda RX-2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30 (260 Nm) has 103 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Mazda RX-2. (157 Nm). This means 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Mazda RX-2.

Compare all specifications: