1997 BMW Mini ACV 30 vs. 1978 Volvo 265
To start off, 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Volvo 265. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Volvo 265 would be higher. At 2,664 cc (6 cylinders), 1978 Volvo 265 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Volvo 265 (148 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30. (140 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1978 Volvo 265 should accelerate faster than 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30 weights approximately 191 kg more than 1978 Volvo 265.
Because 1978 Volvo 265 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Volvo 265. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30 (260 Nm) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Volvo 265. (218 Nm). This means 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Volvo 265.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30 | 1978 Volvo 265 | |
| Make | BMW | Volvo |
| Model | Mini ACV 30 | 265 |
| Year Released | 1997 | 1978 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1798 cc | 2664 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 140 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Torque | 260 Nm | 218 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1595 kg | 1404 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2660 mm |
