1997 BMW Mini ACV 30 vs. 1989 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 5,735 cc (8 cylinders), 1989 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro (238 HP @ 4300 RPM) has 98 more horse power than 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30. (140 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30.
Because 1989 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro (467 Nm) has 207 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30. (260 Nm). This means 1989 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30 | 1989 Chevrolet Camaro | |
| Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
| Model | Mini ACV 30 | Camaro |
| Year Released | 1997 | 1989 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1798 cc | 5735 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 140 HP | 238 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4300 RPM |
| Torque | 260 Nm | 467 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2580 mm |
