1997 BMW Mini ACV 30 vs. 1994 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,134 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Oldsmobile Cutlass (158 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30. (140 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Oldsmobile Cutlass should accelerate faster than 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30 weights approximately 65 kg more than 1994 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30 (260 Nm) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (251 Nm). This means 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Compare all specifications:
1997 BMW Mini ACV 30 | 1994 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | BMW | Oldsmobile |
Model | Mini ACV 30 | Cutlass |
Year Released | 1997 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1798 cc | 3134 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 140 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 260 Nm | 251 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1595 kg | 1530 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2740 mm |