1997 BMW Mini ACV 30 vs. 1999 Chevrolet Malibu
To start off, 1999 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30 would be higher. At 2,392 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Chevrolet Malibu (150 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30. (140 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30 weights approximately 209 kg more than 1999 Chevrolet Malibu.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30 (260 Nm) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Chevrolet Malibu. (210 Nm). This means 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Chevrolet Malibu.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30 | 1999 Chevrolet Malibu | |
| Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
| Model | Mini ACV 30 | Malibu |
| Year Released | 1997 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1798 cc | 2392 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 140 HP | 150 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 260 Nm | 210 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1595 kg | 1386 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2760 mm |
