1997 BMW Mini ACV 30 vs. 2002 Proton Impian
To start off, 2002 Proton Impian is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30 would be higher. At 1,798 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30 (140 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 2002 Proton Impian. (102 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30 should accelerate faster than 2002 Proton Impian. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30 weights approximately 390 kg more than 2002 Proton Impian. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30 (260 Nm) has 120 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Proton Impian. (140 Nm). This means 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Proton Impian.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30 | 2002 Proton Impian | |
| Make | BMW | Proton |
| Model | Mini ACV 30 | Impian |
| Year Released | 1997 | 2002 |
| Engine Size | 1798 cc | 1584 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 140 HP | 102 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 260 Nm | 140 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1595 kg | 1205 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2610 mm |
