1997 BMW Mini ACV 30 vs. 2004 GMC Sierra
To start off, 2004 GMC Sierra is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30 would be higher. At 5,964 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 GMC Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 GMC Sierra (300 HP) has 160 more horse power than 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30. (140 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 GMC Sierra should accelerate faster than 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 GMC Sierra weights approximately 742 kg more than 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 GMC Sierra is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 GMC Sierra. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 GMC Sierra (488 Nm) has 228 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30. (260 Nm). This means 2004 GMC Sierra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30.
Compare all specifications:
1997 BMW Mini ACV 30 | 2004 GMC Sierra | |
Make | BMW | GMC |
Model | Mini ACV 30 | Sierra |
Year Released | 1997 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1798 cc | 5964 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 140 HP | 300 HP |
Torque | 260 Nm | 488 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1595 kg | 2337 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 3380 mm |