1997 BMW Mini ACV 30 vs. 2006 BMW M3
To start off, 2006 BMW M3 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30 would be higher. At 3,245 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 BMW M3 (333 HP @ 7900 RPM) has 193 more horse power than 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30. (140 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30 weights approximately 25 kg more than 2006 BMW M3.
Because 2006 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 BMW M3 (355 Nm) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30. (260 Nm). This means 2006 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30.
Compare all specifications:
1997 BMW Mini ACV 30 | 2006 BMW M3 | |
Make | BMW | BMW |
Model | Mini ACV 30 | M3 |
Year Released | 1997 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1798 cc | 3245 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 140 HP | 333 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 7900 RPM |
Torque | 260 Nm | 355 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1595 kg | 1570 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2740 mm |