1997 BMW Mini ACV 30 vs. 2008 Chevrolet Tahoe
To start off, 2008 Chevrolet Tahoe is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30 would be higher. At 4,800 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Chevrolet Tahoe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Chevrolet Tahoe (296 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 156 more horse power than 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30. (140 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet Tahoe should accelerate faster than 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30.
Because 2008 Chevrolet Tahoe is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Chevrolet Tahoe. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Chevrolet Tahoe (414 Nm) has 154 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30. (260 Nm). This means 2008 Chevrolet Tahoe will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30.
Compare all specifications:
1997 BMW Mini ACV 30 | 2008 Chevrolet Tahoe | |
Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
Model | Mini ACV 30 | Tahoe |
Year Released | 1997 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1798 cc | 4800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 140 HP | 296 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 260 Nm | 414 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2950 mm |