1997 BMW Mini ACV 30 vs. 2009 Dodge Dakota
To start off, 2009 Dodge Dakota is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30 would be higher. At 3,701 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Dodge Dakota (211 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30. (140 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Dakota should accelerate faster than 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Dodge Dakota weights approximately 96 kg more than 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Dodge Dakota is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Dakota will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Dodge Dakota (319 Nm) has 59 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30. (260 Nm). This means 2009 Dodge Dakota will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30.
Compare all specifications:
1997 BMW Mini ACV 30 | 2009 Dodge Dakota | |
Make | BMW | Dodge |
Model | Mini ACV 30 | Dakota |
Year Released | 1997 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1798 cc | 3701 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 140 HP | 211 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 260 Nm | 319 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1595 kg | 1691 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 3340 mm |