1997 BMW Mini ACV 30 vs. 2010 BMW X6
To start off, 2010 BMW X6 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30 would be higher. At 4,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 BMW X6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 BMW X6 (400 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 260 more horse power than 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30. (140 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 BMW X6 should accelerate faster than 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 BMW X6 weights approximately 795 kg more than 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 BMW X6 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 BMW X6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 BMW X6 (609 Nm) has 349 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30. (260 Nm). This means 2010 BMW X6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30 | 2010 BMW X6 | |
| Make | BMW | BMW |
| Model | Mini ACV 30 | X6 |
| Year Released | 1997 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1798 cc | 4400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 140 HP | 400 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 260 Nm | 609 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1595 kg | 2390 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2934 mm |
