1997 BMW Mini ACV 30 vs. 2010 Honda Ridgeline
To start off, 2010 Honda Ridgeline is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30 would be higher. At 3,471 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Honda Ridgeline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Honda Ridgeline (250 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30. (140 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Honda Ridgeline should accelerate faster than 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30 weights approximately 402 kg more than 2010 Honda Ridgeline.
Because 2010 Honda Ridgeline is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Honda Ridgeline will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Honda Ridgeline (335 Nm) has 75 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30. (260 Nm). This means 2010 Honda Ridgeline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30 | 2010 Honda Ridgeline | |
| Make | BMW | Honda |
| Model | Mini ACV 30 | Ridgeline |
| Year Released | 1997 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1798 cc | 3471 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 140 HP | 250 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Torque | 260 Nm | 335 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1595 kg | 1193 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 3110 mm |
