1997 BMW Mini ACV 30 vs. 2010 Kia Sedona
To start off, 2010 Kia Sedona is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30 would be higher. At 3,800 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Kia Sedona is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Kia Sedona (244 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 104 more horse power than 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30. (140 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Kia Sedona should accelerate faster than 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Kia Sedona weights approximately 385 kg more than 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Kia Sedona (343 Nm) has 83 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30. (260 Nm). This means 2010 Kia Sedona will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30 | 2010 Kia Sedona | |
| Make | BMW | Kia |
| Model | Mini ACV 30 | Sedona |
| Year Released | 1997 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1798 cc | 3800 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 140 HP | 244 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 260 Nm | 343 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1595 kg | 1980 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2891 mm |
