1997 BMW Mini ACV 30 vs. 2010 Scion tC
To start off, 2010 Scion tC is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Scion tC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Scion tC (161 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30. (140 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Scion tC should accelerate faster than 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30 (260 Nm) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Scion tC. (219 Nm). This means 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Scion tC. 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30 has automatic transmission and 2010 Scion tC has manual transmission. 2010 Scion tC will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1997 BMW Mini ACV 30 | 2010 Scion tC | |
Make | BMW | Scion |
Model | Mini ACV 30 | tC |
Year Released | 1997 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1798 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 140 HP | 161 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 260 Nm | 219 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2700 mm |