1997 BMW Mini ACV 30 vs. 2012 Honda Fit
To start off, 2012 Honda Fit is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30 would be higher. At 1,798 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30 (140 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 2012 Honda Fit. (117 HP @ 6600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30 should accelerate faster than 2012 Honda Fit. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30 weights approximately 443 kg more than 2012 Honda Fit. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30 (260 Nm) has 116 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Honda Fit. (144 Nm). This means 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Honda Fit.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30 | 2012 Honda Fit | |
| Make | BMW | Honda |
| Model | Mini ACV 30 | Fit |
| Year Released | 1997 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1798 cc | 1500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 140 HP | 117 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6600 RPM |
| Torque | 260 Nm | 144 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1595 kg | 1152 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2499 mm |
