1997 BMW Mini ACV 30 vs. 2012 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2012 Jaguar XF is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Jaguar XF (237 HP) has 97 more horse power than 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30. (140 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30.
Because 2012 Jaguar XF is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Jaguar XF. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Jaguar XF (500 Nm) has 240 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30. (260 Nm). This means 2012 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30 | 2012 Jaguar XF | |
| Make | BMW | Jaguar |
| Model | Mini ACV 30 | XF |
| Year Released | 1997 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1798 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 140 HP | 237 HP |
| Torque | 260 Nm | 500 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2908 mm |
