1997 BMW S3 vs. 1965 ZAZ 966
To start off, 1997 BMW S3 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 ZAZ 966. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 ZAZ 966 would be higher. At 3,201 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 BMW S3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 BMW S3 (260 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 233 more horse power than 1965 ZAZ 966. (27 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1997 BMW S3 should accelerate faster than 1965 ZAZ 966. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 BMW S3 weights approximately 628 kg more than 1965 ZAZ 966. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 BMW S3 (330 Nm) has 278 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 ZAZ 966. (52 Nm). This means 1997 BMW S3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 ZAZ 966.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 BMW S3 | 1965 ZAZ 966 | |
| Make | BMW | ZAZ |
| Model | S3 | 966 |
| Year Released | 1997 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 3201 cc | 887 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 260 HP | 27 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 330 Nm | 52 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1368 kg | 740 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1540 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2170 mm |
