1997 BMW S3 vs. 2003 Chevrolet SSR

To start off, 2003 Chevrolet SSR is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 BMW S3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 BMW S3 would be higher. At 5,316 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Chevrolet SSR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Chevrolet SSR (296 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 1997 BMW S3. (260 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet SSR should accelerate faster than 1997 BMW S3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Chevrolet SSR weights approximately 786 kg more than 1997 BMW S3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Chevrolet SSR (449 Nm) has 119 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 BMW S3. (330 Nm). This means 2003 Chevrolet SSR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 BMW S3. 2003 Chevrolet SSR has automatic transmission and 1997 BMW S3 has manual transmission. 1997 BMW S3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Chevrolet SSR will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: