1997 BMW Z3 vs. 1954 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1997 BMW Z3 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,423 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 BMW Z3 (333 HP @ 7500 RPM) has 66 more horse power than 1954 Cadillac 62. (267 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1997 BMW Z3 should accelerate faster than 1954 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 607 kg more than 1997 BMW Z3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1954 Cadillac 62 has automatic transmission and 1997 BMW Z3 has manual transmission. 1997 BMW Z3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1954 Cadillac 62 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 BMW Z3 | 1954 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | Z3 | 62 |
| Year Released | 1997 | 1954 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3245 cc | 5423 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 333 HP | 267 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1393 kg | 2000 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 5510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 2050 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1590 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 3290 mm |
