1997 BMW Z3 vs. 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1997 BMW Z3 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,245 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 BMW Z3 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 BMW Z3 weights approximately 73 kg more than 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 1997 BMW Z3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 BMW Z3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1997 BMW Z3 | 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | BMW | Oldsmobile |
Model | Z3 | Cutlass |
Year Released | 1997 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3245 cc | 2260 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 333 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1393 kg | 1320 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2680 mm |