1997 BMW Z3 vs. 2002 Honda Acty

To start off, 2002 Honda Acty is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 BMW Z3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 BMW Z3 would be higher. At 3,245 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 BMW Z3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 BMW Z3 (333 HP @ 7500 RPM) has 206 more horse power than 2002 Honda Acty. (127 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1997 BMW Z3 should accelerate faster than 2002 Honda Acty. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 BMW Z3 weights approximately 553 kg more than 2002 Honda Acty. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1997 BMW Z3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 BMW Z3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Honda Acty, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 BMW Z3 (355 Nm) has 216 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Honda Acty. (139 Nm). This means 1997 BMW Z3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Honda Acty.

Compare all specifications: