1997 BMW Z3 vs. 2013 Cadillac XTS

To start off, 2013 Cadillac XTS is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 BMW Z3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 BMW Z3 would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac XTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 BMW Z3 (333 HP @ 7500 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 2013 Cadillac XTS. (314 HP @ 6800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1997 BMW Z3 should accelerate faster than 2013 Cadillac XTS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac XTS weights approximately 519 kg more than 1997 BMW Z3.

Because 2013 Cadillac XTS is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1997 BMW Z3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac XTS will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac XTS (358 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 BMW Z3. (355 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 2013 Cadillac XTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 BMW Z3. 2013 Cadillac XTS has automatic transmission and 1997 BMW Z3 has manual transmission. 1997 BMW Z3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Cadillac XTS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1997 BMW Z3 2013 Cadillac XTS
Make BMW Cadillac
Model Z3 XTS
Year Released 1997 2013
Body Type Convertible Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3245 cc 3564 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 333 HP 314 HP
Engine RPM 7500 RPM 6800 RPM
Torque 355 Nm 358 Nm
Torque RPM 3250 RPM 5200 RPM
Engine Bore Size 86.4 mm 94 mm
Engine Stroke Size 89.6 mm 86 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.5:1 11.5
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear AWD
Transmission Type Manual 6-speed automatic
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1393 kg 1912 kg
Vehicle Length 4030 mm 5131 mm
Vehicle Width 1750 mm 1852 mm
Vehicle Height 1270 mm 1510 mm
Wheelbase Size 2450 mm 2831 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 51 L 76 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]