1997 Bristol Blenheim vs. 1992 Mazda 626

To start off, 1997 Bristol Blenheim is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 5,897 cc (8 cylinders), 1997 Bristol Blenheim is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Bristol Blenheim (350 HP) has 244 more horse power than 1992 Mazda 626. (106 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Bristol Blenheim should accelerate faster than 1992 Mazda 626. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Bristol Blenheim weights approximately 595 kg more than 1992 Mazda 626. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1997 Bristol Blenheim is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 Bristol Blenheim. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Mazda 626, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Bristol Blenheim (500 Nm) has 343 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Mazda 626. (157 Nm). This means 1997 Bristol Blenheim will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Mazda 626. 1997 Bristol Blenheim has automatic transmission and 1992 Mazda 626 has manual transmission. 1992 Mazda 626 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1997 Bristol Blenheim will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: