1997 Buick LeSabre vs. 2006 Holden Commodore

To start off, 2006 Holden Commodore is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Buick LeSabre. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Buick LeSabre would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Buick LeSabre is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Holden Commodore (240 HP) has 38 more horse power than 1997 Buick LeSabre. (202 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1997 Buick LeSabre.

Because 2006 Holden Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Holden Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Buick LeSabre, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Buick LeSabre (312 Nm) has 72 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Holden Commodore. (240 Nm). This means 1997 Buick LeSabre will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Holden Commodore. 1997 Buick LeSabre has automatic transmission and 2006 Holden Commodore has manual transmission. 2006 Holden Commodore will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1997 Buick LeSabre will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: