1997 Buick Riviera vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS

To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Buick Riviera. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Buick Riviera would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Buick Riviera is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac CTS (314 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 134 more horse power than 1997 Buick Riviera. (180 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1997 Buick Riviera. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 176 kg more than 1997 Buick Riviera. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2013 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Buick Riviera, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac CTS (373 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Buick Riviera. (364 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2013 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Buick Riviera.

Compare all specifications:

1997 Buick Riviera 2013 Cadillac CTS
Make Buick Cadillac
Model Riviera CTS
Year Released 1997 2013
Body Type Coupe Station Wagon
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3790 cc 3600 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Horse Power 180 HP 314 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 6800 RPM
Torque 364 Nm 373 Nm
Torque RPM 2400 RPM 4900 RPM
Engine Bore Size 96.5 mm 89 mm
Engine Stroke Size 86.4 mm 80 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 8.0:1 11.7
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Automatic 6-speed automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1681 kg 1857 kg
Vehicle Length 5230 mm 4877 mm
Vehicle Width 2040 mm 1842 mm
Vehicle Height 1380 mm 1473 mm
Wheelbase Size 2900 mm 2880 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 88 L 68 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]