1997 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1976 Volvo 66
To start off, 1997 Cadillac DeVille is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 1997 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Cadillac DeVille (271 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 215 more horse power than 1976 Volvo 66. (56 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1976 Volvo 66.
Because 1976 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Cadillac DeVille | 1976 Volvo 66 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
| Model | DeVille | 66 |
| Year Released | 1997 | 1976 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4600 cc | 1289 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 271 HP | 56 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 5330 mm | 3910 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1550 mm |
