1997 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1982 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 1997 Cadillac DeVille is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Volkswagen Polo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Volkswagen Polo would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 1997 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Cadillac DeVille (271 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 233 more horse power than 1982 Volkswagen Polo. (38 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1982 Volkswagen Polo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 1005 kg more than 1982 Volkswagen Polo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Cadillac DeVille | 1982 Volkswagen Polo | |
| Make | Cadillac | Volkswagen |
| Model | DeVille | Polo |
| Year Released | 1997 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4600 cc | 1043 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 271 HP | 38 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1705 kg | 700 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5330 mm | 3660 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1590 mm |
