1997 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2000 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2000 Ford Ranger is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 1997 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Cadillac DeVille (271 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 136 more horse power than 2000 Ford Ranger. (135 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 407 kg more than 2000 Ford Ranger. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Ford Ranger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford Ranger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Cadillac DeVille | 2000 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | DeVille | Ranger |
| Year Released | 1997 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4600 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 271 HP | 135 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1705 kg | 1298 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5330 mm | 4770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1770 mm |
