1997 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2002 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2002 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 1997 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Land Rover Range Rover (282 HP) has 11 more horse power than 1997 Cadillac DeVille. (271 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1997 Cadillac DeVille. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 735 kg more than 1997 Cadillac DeVille. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1997 Cadillac DeVille. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Cadillac DeVille | 2002 Land Rover Range Rover | |
| Make | Cadillac | Land Rover |
| Model | DeVille | Range Rover |
| Year Released | 1997 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4600 cc | 4398 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 271 HP | 282 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1705 kg | 2440 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5330 mm | 4450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1820 mm |
