1997 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2006 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2006 Ford Mustang is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Mustang (300 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1997 Cadillac DeVille. (271 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1997 Cadillac DeVille. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Mustang weights approximately 1151 kg more than 1997 Cadillac DeVille. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Cadillac DeVille | 2006 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | DeVille | Mustang |
Year Released | 1997 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4600 cc | 4605 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 271 HP | 300 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1705 kg | 2856 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5330 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1890 mm |