1997 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2009 Mazda 6
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 1997 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Cadillac DeVille (271 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 6. (182 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 135 kg more than 2009 Mazda 6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Cadillac DeVille | 2009 Mazda 6 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
| Model | DeVille | 6 |
| Year Released | 1997 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4600 cc | 2183 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 271 HP | 182 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1705 kg | 1570 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5330 mm | 4760 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1800 mm |
