1997 Caterham C21 vs. 1966 Sunbeam Tiger
To start off, 1997 Caterham C21 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Sunbeam Tiger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Sunbeam Tiger would be higher. At 4,259 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Sunbeam Tiger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Sunbeam Tiger (163 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1997 Caterham C21. (138 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Sunbeam Tiger should accelerate faster than 1997 Caterham C21. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Sunbeam Tiger weights approximately 486 kg more than 1997 Caterham C21. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Caterham C21 | 1966 Sunbeam Tiger | |
| Make | Caterham | Sunbeam |
| Model | C21 | Tiger |
| Year Released | 1997 | 1966 |
| Engine Size | 1588 cc | 4259 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 138 HP | 163 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 654 kg | 1140 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3810 mm | 3970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1060 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2190 mm |
