1997 Caterham C21 vs. 1975 Mazda 1000
To start off, 1997 Caterham C21 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Mazda 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Mazda 1000 would be higher. At 1,587 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Caterham C21 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Caterham C21 (115 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 66 more horse power than 1975 Mazda 1000. (49 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Caterham C21 should accelerate faster than 1975 Mazda 1000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Mazda 1000 weights approximately 60 kg more than 1997 Caterham C21.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Caterham C21 (145 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 68 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Mazda 1000. (77 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1997 Caterham C21 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Mazda 1000.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Caterham C21 | 1975 Mazda 1000 | |
Make | Caterham | Mazda |
Model | C21 | 1000 |
Year Released | 1997 | 1975 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1587 cc | 987 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 115 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 77 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 650 kg | 710 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3810 mm | 3800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1060 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2270 mm |