1997 Caterham C21 vs. 2008 Mercedes-Benz R
To start off, 2008 Mercedes-Benz R is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Caterham C21. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Caterham C21 would be higher. At 2,987 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Mercedes-Benz R is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Caterham C21 (250 HP @ 8000 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 2008 Mercedes-Benz R. (190 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Caterham C21 should accelerate faster than 2008 Mercedes-Benz R.
Because 2008 Mercedes-Benz R is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1997 Caterham C21. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mercedes-Benz R will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mercedes-Benz R (597 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 345 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Caterham C21. (252 Nm @ 5750 RPM). This means 2008 Mercedes-Benz R will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Caterham C21.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Caterham C21 | 2008 Mercedes-Benz R | |
Make | Caterham | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | C21 | R |
Year Released | 1997 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2987 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 190 HP |
Engine RPM | 8000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 252 Nm | 597 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5750 RPM | 1400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3810 mm | 4940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1060 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2990 mm |