1997 Chevrolet Astro vs. 2000 Ford TL-50

To start off, 2000 Ford TL-50 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Chevrolet Astro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Chevrolet Astro would be higher. At 4,293 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Chevrolet Astro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Chevrolet Astro (183 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 2000 Ford TL-50. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Chevrolet Astro should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford TL-50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Chevrolet Astro weights approximately 593 kg more than 2000 Ford TL-50. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1997 Chevrolet Astro is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Ford TL-50. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Chevrolet Astro will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford TL-50 (570 Nm) has 232 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Chevrolet Astro. (338 Nm). This means 2000 Ford TL-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Chevrolet Astro. 2000 Ford TL-50 has automatic transmission and 1997 Chevrolet Astro has manual transmission. 1997 Chevrolet Astro will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford TL-50 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: