1997 Chevrolet Beretta vs. 2006 Mazda Tribute
To start off, 2006 Mazda Tribute is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Chevrolet Beretta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Chevrolet Beretta would be higher. At 2,260 cc, 2006 Mazda Tribute is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2006 Mazda Tribute is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Mazda Tribute. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Chevrolet Beretta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Chevrolet Beretta | 2006 Mazda Tribute | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Beretta | Tribute |
Year Released | 1997 | 2006 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2190 cc | 2260 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 153 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2630 mm |